Amatrone v. Messina et al
Filing
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 2/4/2010 re 27 Stipulation and Proposed Order filed by Bill Whitney, Robert P. Amatrone, Heather McLaughlin, Allan Schwartzman, City of Benicia, Elizabeth Patterson, Steve Messina, Mark Hughes, Damen Golubics. Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference CONTINUED for 3/5/2010 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom 27 (DAD) before Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd. (Buzo, P)
1 Deborah J. Fox, Esq. (SBN 110929) 2 Kevin E. Gilbert, Esq. (SBN 209236) 3 kgilbert@meyersnave.com
dfox@meyersnave.com
MEYERS, NAVE, RIBACK, SILVER & WILSON 4 333 South Grand Avenue, Suite 1670 Los Angeles, California 90071 5 Telephone: (213) 626-2906 Facsimile: (213) 626-0215
6 8 9
7 Attorneys for Defendants
CITY OF BENICIA, et al. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE NO. 2:08-CV-01831-MCE-DAD STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE
10 12 13 14
v.
11 ROBERT P. AMATRONE,
Plaintiff,
15 STEVE MESSINA; ELIZABETH 16 MARK HUGHES; ALLAN
PATTERSON; BILL WHITNEY;
17 SCHWARTZMAN; HEATHER 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
MCLAUGHLIN; DAMEN GOLUBICS; 18 STEVE RIDGE; CITY OF BENICIA, DOES 1-50, Defendants.
Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Continue Status Conference [08-CV-01831-MCE-DAD]
1 2
STIPULATION The parties hereby stipulate and request the Court enter an order continuing the
3 pending Status Conference currently set for February 5, 2010 at 11:00 am before 4 Magistrate Judge Drozd to March 5, 2010 at 10:00 am in Courtroom 27 of the above5 referenced Court. 6 7 Dated: February 4, 2010 8 9 10 Dated: February 4, 2010 11 12 13 14 15
ORDER Good cause appearing, the Court hereby approves the Stipulation of the parties and By: /s/ Kevin E. Gilbert By: /s/ Robert P. Amatrone
Robert P. Amatrone
Plaintiff
Kevin E. Gilbert, Esq. Attorneys for Defendants City of Benicia, et al.
16 continues the February 5, 2010 Status Conference to March 5, 2010 at 11:00 am in 17 Courtroom 27 of the above-referenced Court. 18 IT IS SO ORDERED. 19 20 Dated: February 4, 2009. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Continue Status Conference [08-CV-01831-MCE-DAD] Ddad1/orders.prose/amatrone1831.contstatus
______________________________________ DALE A. DROZD UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
1
1 3 5 6 7 9 10 11
·
PROOF OF SERVICE
2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
At the time of service, I was over 18 years of age and not a party to this action. I amhemployed in the County of Alameda, State of California. My business address is 555 t 4 12 Street, Suite 1500, Oakland, California 94607. On February 4, 2010, I served true copies of the following document(s): STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE
8 on the interested parties in this action as follows:
Robert Amatrone 691 Silverado Trail South St. Helena, CA 94574 (925) 765-5095
12 BY MAIL: I enclosed the document(s) in a sealed envelope or package addressed to the
person listed above and placed the envelope for collection and mailing, following our ordinary business practices. I am readily familiar with Meyers, Nave, Riback, Silver & 13 Wilson's practice for collecting and processing correspondence for mailing. On the same 14 day that the correspondence is placed for collection and mailing, it is deposited in the ordinary course of business with the United States Postal Service, in a sealed envelope 15 with postage fully prepaid. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct and that I am employed in the office of a member of 17 the bar of this Court at whose direction the service was made.
16 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Executed on February 4, 2010, at Oakland, California.
/s/ Elena D. LaBella
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?