Watts v. Allstate Indemnity Company et al

Filing 130

ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 9/16/2009. Parties SHALL proceed with Discovery related to class certification, and SHALL re-notice Motions to Compel that have been filed with the Magistrate Judge and denied without prejudice to r e-filing pending Court's resolution of Motion to Modify the Scheduling Order: 83 , 99 , and 114 . Each party SHALL notify Court once those Motions have been resolved. At that time, the Court will set a Further Scheduling Conference. Parties are advised to formulate, either separately or by Joint Stipulation, specific proposals for a new Scheduling Order prior to said conference. (Marciel, M)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 ALLSTATE INDEMNITY CO., an Illinois corporation, et al., Defendants. / Pursuant to the telephonic hearing conducted on September 14, 2009, the court VACATES the scheduling order issued on January 22, 2009 in the above-captioned case, Doc. No. 59. In so doing, the ORDER ROBERT WATTS, on behalf of himself individually and all others similarly situated, NO. CIV. S-08-1877 LKK/GGH UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

court GRANTS plaintiff's motion to modify the scheduling order, Doc. No. 90. The parties SHALL proceed with discovery related to

class certification, and SHALL re-notice the motions to compel that have been filed with the magistrate and denied without prejudice to refiling pending this court's resolution of the motion to modify the scheduling order, Doc. Nos. 83, 99, and 114. 1 Each party SHALL

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

notify this court once those motions have been resolved.

At that The

time, the court will set a further scheduling conference.

parties are advised to formulate, either separately or by joint stipulation, specific proposals for a new scheduling order prior to said conference. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: September 16, 2009.

2