Rundle v. Ayers
Filing
91
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 3/1/2012 DISMISSING, as unnecessary, petitioner's 90 request to file an oversized brief. (Yin, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
DAVID ALLEN RUNDLE,
11
12
13
Petitioner,
No. 2:08-cv-01879 GEB KJN
vs.
DEATH PENALTY CASE
WARDEN,
San Quentin State Prison,
14
Respondent.
ORDER
15
/
16
17
Petitioner seeks leave to file a brief in excess of 25 pages. However, petitioner’s
18
brief is not subject to a page limitation by rule or court order. The only rule somewhat related is
19
the requirement that petitioner provide the court a courtesy paper copy of any electronically filed
20
brief which exceeds 25 pages. Local Rule 133(f).
21
Accordingly, petitioner’s February 29, 2012 request to file an oversized brief is
22
dismissed as unnecessary. (However, to the extent possible, brevity is appreciated.)
23
DATE: March 1, 2012
24
_____________________________________
KENDALL J. NEWMAN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
25
26
rundle over brf.or
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?