Rundle v. Ayers

Filing 91

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 3/1/2012 DISMISSING, as unnecessary, petitioner's 90 request to file an oversized brief. (Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID ALLEN RUNDLE, 11 12 13 Petitioner, No. 2:08-cv-01879 GEB KJN vs. DEATH PENALTY CASE WARDEN, San Quentin State Prison, 14 Respondent. ORDER 15 / 16 17 Petitioner seeks leave to file a brief in excess of 25 pages. However, petitioner’s 18 brief is not subject to a page limitation by rule or court order. The only rule somewhat related is 19 the requirement that petitioner provide the court a courtesy paper copy of any electronically filed 20 brief which exceeds 25 pages. Local Rule 133(f). 21 Accordingly, petitioner’s February 29, 2012 request to file an oversized brief is 22 dismissed as unnecessary. (However, to the extent possible, brevity is appreciated.) 23 DATE: March 1, 2012 24 _____________________________________ KENDALL J. NEWMAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 25 26 rundle over brf.or 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?