Stevens v. Deere & Company

Filing 56

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 9/14/10 ORDERING that the trial is continued to 5/3/2011 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GEB) before Judge Garland E. Burrell Jr. (Owen, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Arthur L. Morgan, CSB 077498 LAW OFFICES OF HALKIDES, MORGAN & KELLEY 833 MISTLETOE LANE POST OFFICE DRAWER 492170 REDDING, CALIFORNIA 96049-2170 (530) 221-8150 FAX (530) 221-7963 art@reddinglaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiff J.S., a Minor UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION SHIRLEY KNIGHT, Guardian ad Litem for J.S., a minor, and MARLENE FAGAN and HOMER FAGAN, Plaintiffs, v. DEERE & COMPANY, Defendant. / No. 2:08-01903-GEB-EFB STIPULATION AND ORDER TO RESCHEDULE TRIAL DATE Trial: January 25, 2011 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties in the above-captioned action that the trial date of January 25, 2011, be continued to May 3, 2011, as counsel for plaintiff J.S. has two other trials scheduled in Shasta County Superior Court on January 19, 2011, and February 1, 2011, which would overlap with the above-captioned trial. SO STIPULATED: DATED: September 14, 2010 HALKIDES, MORGAN & KELLEY By___/S/ Arthur L. Morgan ARTHUR L. MORGAN Attorneys for Plaintiff J.S., a Minor /// STIPULATION AND ORDER TO RESCHEDULE TRIAL DATE 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 DATED: September 14, 2010 LAW OFFICES OF MICHAEL W. JANSEN By /S/ Michael W. Jansen MICHAEL W. JANSEN Attorneys for Plaintiffs HOMER FAGAN and MARLENE FAGAN DATED: September 14, 2010 THE RYAN LAW GROUP By /S/ Stephen E. Paffrath STEPHEN E. PAFFRATH Attorneys for Defendant DEERE & COMPANY IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: 9/15/2010 _________________________ GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. United States District Judge DEAC_Signature-END: 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO RESCHEDULE TRIAL DATE 61khh4bb 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?