Autar v. Newcomb et al

Filing 18

ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 1/6/09 GRANTING 7 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Attorney Potratz is relieved as counsel of record for Pltf effective immediately. Accordingly, Pltf now represents herself. (Engbretson, K.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 NATHANIEL POTRATZ, ESQ., SBN 215734 LAW OFFICES OF NATHANIEL POTRATZ 4790 Dewey Drive, Suite A Fair Oaks, California 95628 Telephone: (916) 962-2780 Facsimile: (916) 962-2705 Attorney for Plaintiff 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 /// 1 PROPOSED ORDER EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO ___________________________________________________________ CHEVONDA AUTAR, on behalf of herself, and as a private attorney general on behalf of all those similarly situated and the general public, ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) ROYCE NEWCOMB; KATHLEEN ) NEWCOMB, alias KATHY NEWCOMB; RK ) FORECLOSURE SPECIALISTS, business ) entity form unknown; Does 1 through 10, ) inclusive, ) ) Defendants. ) ) ______________________________________ ) CASE NO: 2:08-cv-01934-GEB-EFB ORDER The motion of Nathaniel Potratz, Esq. to be relieved as counsel of record for Plaintiff Chevonda Autar is suitable for decision without oral argument. L.R. 78-230(h). Attorney Potratz filed a declaration in which he declares his client has been served with the motion by mail. Attorney Potratz has shown sufficient reason justifying an order granting his motion to withdraw as counsel for Plaintiff. Therefore, the motion is granted; and, attorney Potratz is relieved as counsel of record for Plaintiff effective immediately. Accordingly, Plaintiff now represents herself. Plaintiff's current address is 5595 Rightwood 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Way, Sacramento, CA 95823; and current phone number is 916-236-9436. Dated: January 6, 2009 GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. United States District Judge 2 PROPOSED ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?