Lopez Rodriguez, et al v. SGLC Inc., et al
Filing
134
ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 11/14/2011 ORDERING 129 Motion for Discovery is GRANTED; plaintiffs may exceed the 10 deposition limit and take the four additional depositions of the representative of Jesus Yepez, Matthew Hemly, Ju lie Ball and the FRCP 30(b)(6) deposition of the representative of Vino Farms, Inc.; FURTHER ORDERED that the amended scheduling order is modified to allow plaintiffs the opportunity to schedule and depose the aforementioned individuals and complete all other necessary proceedings related to those depositions no later than 1/31/2012. (Waggoner, D)
1
2
3
Cynthia L. Rice (SBN 87630)
CALIFORNIA RURAL LEGAL ASSISTANCE, INC.
631 Howard Street, Suite 300
San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone: (415) 777-2752
Facsimile: (415) 543-2752
4
5
6
7
Blanca Bañuelos (SBN 231585)
Esmeralda Zendejas (SBN 258809)
CALIFORNIA RURAL LEGAL ASSISTANCE, INC.
145 E. Weber Avenue
Stockton, CA 95202
Telephone: (209) 946-0605
Facsimile: (209) 946-5730
8
9
10
11
12
13
Attorneys for Plaintiffs Sergio Aguirre Batista, Hugo Santiago Arredondo Huerta, Daniel Becerra
Aguilar, Israel Blas Jimenez, Librado Blas Martinez, Ramiro Alejandro Garcia Castro, Enrique
Garcia Michel, Jaime Lopez Ramos, Fray Marcelino Lopez Rodriguez, Luis Ramon Naranjo
Campos, Angel Pano Ruiz, Frisdman Peña Ochoa, Aldo Manuel Rodriguez Zepeda, Octavio
Revolledo Godinez, Agustin Torres Elias, Tomas Ayala Gonzalez, Marco Cesar Garcia
Gutierrez, Jose Luis Rodriquez, Armando Zuniga Arias, Joel Murillo Guerrero, Oscar Manuel
Carillo Torres, Christian Ceja Ruiz, Christian Cruz Valverde, Demetrio Montes Gaitan, Gibran
Rigoberto Diaz Campo, Leonel Esparza Ramirez, Benigno Martinez Marquez, Rene Meza
Sanchez, Jesus Junior Robles Rodriquez, Luis Manuel Torres Contreras, Uriel Torres Contreras,
Juan Alfonso Bailon Marquez, Hugo Cesar Ceja Ibarra, Rigoberto Sandoval Preciado, Roberto
Cruz Barragan, Obed Mares Contreras
14
16
17
Julia L. Montgomery (SBN 184083)
CALIFORNIA RURAL LEGAL
ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION
2210 K Street, Suite 201
Sacramento, CA 95814
Telephone: (916) 446-7901
Facsimile: (916) 446-3057
Mark Talamantes (SBN 187961)
TALAMANTES/VILLEGAS/CARRERA, LLP
170 Columbus Avenue, Suite 300
San Francisco, CA 94133
Telephone: (415) 989-8000
Facsimile: (415) 989-8028
Attorneys for all Plaintiffs
15
Attorneys for all Plaintiffs
18
19
20
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
21
22
FRAY MARCELINO LOPEZ RODRIGUEZ,
et al.,
23
Plaintiffs,
24
v.
25
CASE NO. 2:08-CV-01971-MCE-KJN
ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO
EXCEED 10 DEPOSITIONS AND TO
MODIFY THE AMENDED
SCHEDULING ORDER
SGLC INC., et al.,
26
Defendants.
27
28
O RD ER O N
P LAIN TIFFS ’ M O TIO N
TO
E XCEED 10 D EPO SITIO NS
AN D TO
M O D IFY A M EN D ED S CHEDULIN G O RD ER
1
1
Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ motion pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(a)(2)(A)(i) and
2
16(b)(4), for an order to exceed the 10 deposition limit and to modify the amended scheduling
3
order.
4
Having read the motion, the points and authorities, and Defendants’ opposition of the
5
motion, the Court finds good cause for granting the motion. No oral argument will be heard on
6
this motion.
7
THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the Plaintiffs may exceed the 10
8
deposition limit and take the four additional depositions of Jesus Yepez, Matthew Hemly, Julie
9
Ball and the Fed. Rules Civ. Proc. 30(b)(6) deposition of the representative of Vino Farms, Inc.
10
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the amended scheduling order is modified to allow
11
Plaintiffs the opportunity to schedule and depose the aforementioned individuals and and
12
complete all other necessary proceedings related to those depositions y no later than January 31,
13
2012.
14
Dated: November 14, 2011
15
________________________________
MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
O RD ER O N
P LAIN TIFFS ’ M O TIO N
TO
E XCEED 10 D EPO SITIO NS
AN D TO
M O D IFY A M EN D ED S CHEDULIN G O RD ER
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?