Van Scott v. Moore et al

Filing 29

ORDER signed by Circuit Judge Raymond C. Fisher on 10/14/2009 ORDERING defendants to submit to the court w/in 14 days of the date of this order a statement indicating (1) whether pltf remains incarcerated at CSP-Solano; (2), if pltf no longer remains incarcerated at CSP-Solano, pltf's current address, if known by DOCR; and (3), if pltf remains incarcerated at CSP-Solano, an explanation for DOCR's failure to deliver legal mail to pltf.(Matson, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 CARLTON VAN SCOTT 4 Plaintiff, 5 v. 6 GLENDA MOORE et al., 7 Defendants. 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 2:08-cv-2006-RCF (PC) ORDER RE UNDELIVERED MAIL _____________________________ 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -1Plaintiff Carlton Van Scott is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. section 1983. On July 10, 2009, the court issued an order dismissing defendants Lowe, Roherer, Toppenburger, Traquina and Naku from this action and served the order on plaintiff. On August 10, 2009, the order served on plaintiff was returned by the U.S. Postal Service as undeliverable. On October 13, 2009, the court telephoned the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (DOCR) Identification Unit at (916) 445-6713. The Identification Unit informed the court that plaintiff remains incarcerated at CSP-Solano. In light of the foregoing, defendants are ordered to submit to the court within 14 days of the date of this order a statement indicating (1) whether plaintiff remains incarcerated at CSP-Solano; (2), if plaintiff no longer remains incarcerated at CSP-Solano, plaintiff's current address, if known by DOCR; and (3), if plaintiff remains incarcerated at CSP-Solano, an explanation for DOCR's failure to deliver legal mail to plaintiff. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: October 14, 2009 /s/ Raymond C. Fisher Raymond C. Fisher, United States Circuit Judge Sitting by Designation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?