Robinson et al v. Arrants

Filing 13

ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 01/09/2009 GRANTING 12 Stipulation of Dismissal. Case DISMISSED with prejudice, parties to bear their own attorneys fees and costs. CASE CLOSED. (Streeter, J)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 2 23 24 25 26 27 28 Jeffery A. Briggs, Esq. Law Offices of Jeffery A. Briggs California State Bar No. 211227 175 East Plumb Lane, Suite 107 Reno, NV 89502 (775) 786-155 (775) 786-5228 (fax) Attorney for Plaintiffs, DORA ROBINSON AND TED ROBINSON UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA DORA ROBINSON AND TED ROBINSON, Plaintiff, v. PETER M. ARRANTS d/b/a "LE VINING CHEVRON" and DOES ONE through FIFTY, inclusive, Defendants. ) Case No. 2:08-CV-02010-JAM-KJM ) ) ) STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR ) DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiffs DORA ROBINSON AND TED ROBINSON and Defendant PETER M. ARRANTS, by and through their respective attorneys of record, hereby stipulate as follows: 1. Plaintiffs and Defendant agre to the dismissal of al Defendants with prejudice, each party to bear his, her or its own attorneys fees and costs and respectfully request that the entire case be dismissed with prejudice. // // // // PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 2 23 24 25 26 27 28 2. Accordingly, the Parties jointly request the Court to dismis al parties from this action and that the entire case be dismissed with prejudice. IT IS SO STIPULATED. Dated: December 4, 2008 ____________/s/_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ JEFFERY A. BRIGGS, Attorney for Plaintif BERGER SILVERMAN & GEPHART Dated: December 4, 2008 ___________/s/__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ CLAUDIA SILVERMAN, Attorney for Defendant ORDER IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 9, 2009 /s/ John A. Mendez________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?