Johnson v. Robinson
ORDER signed by Circuit Judge Raymond C. Fisher on 4/6/09 ORDERING that Plaintiff's MOTION for an order extending time to file an amended complaint, filed 4/2/09 12 is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint no later than 5/1/09. The Clerk's Office shall send Plaintiff a copy of his original complaint 1 and first amended complaint 7 along with this order.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
vs. ROBINSON, et al., Defendants. / ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT On March 20, 2009, this court screened plaintiff's pro se amended complaint; found he had stated a cognizable claim for relief against one defendant, but had failed to state additional claims against that defendant and other named defendants; and gave him 30 days to either file an amended complaint or notify the court he wished to proceed on the cognizable claim only (see Docket No. 10). Plaintiff has informed the court he wishes to file an amended complaint and seeks an extension of time for filing it. Good cause having been shown, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. Plaintiff's motion for an order extending time to file an amended complaint, filed April 2, 2009 (Docket No. 12), is granted. 1 DUANE JOHNSON, Plaintiff, No. 2:08-CV-2046-RCF IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint no later than May 1, 2009. The Clerk's Office shall send plaintiff a copy of his original complaint (Docket No. 1) and first amended complaint (Docket No. 7) along with this order.
If plaintiff fails to file his amended complaint by May 1, 2009 or seek a further extension, this action will be dismissed for failure to comply with a court order.
DATED: April 6, 2009 /s/ Raymond C. Fisher
9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
2 UNITED STATES CIRCUIT JUDGE Sitting by Designation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?