Allara v. Old Folsom State Prison et al

Filing 18

ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 1/27/09 ORDERING that the 14 findings and recommendations filed October 14, 2008, are adopted in full. Petitioner's 1 application for a writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED without prejudice to filing a civil rights action. CASE CLOSED. (Duong, D)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Respondents. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 / Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262. On October 14, 2008, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on petitioner and which contained notice to petitioner that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. On November 13, 2008, petitioner was granted an additional thirty days to file objections. The time period has now expired and petitioner has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations. ///// ///// 1 ORDER vs. OLD FOLSOM STATE PRISON, et al., IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ANTHONY ALLARA, Petitioner, No. CIV S-08-2051 LKK DAD P 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 and The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The findings and recommendations filed October 14, 2008, are adopted in full; 2. Petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus is dismissed without prejudice to filing a civil rights action. DATED: January 27, 2009. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?