Rothery et al v Blanas et al

Filing 14

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 2/6/09 re 13 ORDERING that the dfts are GRANTED time including 4/2/09 to file their responsive pleadings. (Duong, D)

1 EDMUND G. BROWN JR. Attorney General of the State of California 2 CHRISTOPHER E. KRUEGER Senior Assistant Attorney General 3 DOUGLAS J. WOODS Supervising Deputy Attorney General 4 GEOFFREY L. GRAYBILL, State Bar No. 53643 Deputy Attorney General 1300 I Street, Suite 125 5 P.O. Box 944255 Sacramento, CA 94244-2550 6 Telephone: [phone] Fax: [phone] Email: [e-mail] 8 Attorneys for Defendant Edmund G. Brown Jr., Attorney General of the State of California 9 10 11 12 13 14 Plaintiffs, 15 v. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Defendants. 23 24 Plaintiffs and Defendant Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Attorney General of the State of Former Sheriff LOU BLANAS; SHERIFF JOHN MCGINNIS; Detective TIM SHEEHAN; Detective FRED MASON; SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, an independent branch of government of the COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO; COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO; STATE OF CALIFORNIA ATTORNEY GENERAL JERRY BROWN; DOES 1 through 25, unknown co-conspirators; ATTORNEY GENERAL MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT BY AND BETWEEN PLAINTIFFS AND DEFENDANT EDMUND G. BROWN, JR., ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA JAMES ROTHERY, Esq.; ANDREA HOFFMAN, CASE NO: 2:08-cv-02064-JAMKJM IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

25 California hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 26 That Plaintiffs agree to supplement the stipulation pursuant to Local Rule 6-144(a)

27 filed January 16, 2009 extending the time for filing a responsive pleading by said Defendant to 28 and including February 20, 2009 by extending time to respond to Plaintiff's complaint to and
S T I P U L A T I O N TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT CASE NO: 2:08-cv-02064-JAM-KJM B Y AND BETWEEN PLAINTIFFS AND DEFENDANT BROWN; ORDER

1

1 including April 2, 2009 which corresponds to the date on which the responsive pleadings of 2 defendants County of Sacramento, John McGinness, Timothy Sheehan, Lou Blanas and Fred 3 Mason are due ; and 4 The parties are in agreement with the Court's order entered January 21, 2009, staying

5 this current litigation until a decision is rendered by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in the 6 Case of: 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 14 Dated: February 6, 2009 15 16 17 18 19 / / / 20 / / / 21 / / / 22 / / / 23 / / / 24 / / / 25 / / / 26 / / / 27 / / / 28 / / /
S T I P U L A T I O N TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT CASE NO: 2:08-cv-02064-JAM-KJM B Y AND BETWEEN PLAINTIFFS AND DEFENDANT BROWN; ORDER

DAVID K. MEHL LOK T LAU, Plaintiffs, vs. LOU BLANAS, individually and in his official capacity as SHERIFF OF COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO; COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT; COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO; BILL LOCKYER, Attorney General, State of California; RANDI ROSSI, State Firearms Director and Custodian of Records, Defendants, USDC, Eastern District Case No.: CIV S-03 - 2682 MCE KJM Appellate Case No. 08-15773, Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

LAW OFFICES OF GARY W. GORSKI

By: /S/ Gary W. Gorski (as authorized on 2/6/09) Gary W. Gorski, Attorney for Plaintiffs James Rothery, Esq. and Andrea Hoffman

2

1 Dated: February 6, 2009 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
0 8 c v2 0 6 4 . o .2 6 . w p d

EDMUND G. BROWN JR. Attorney General of the State of California CHRISTOPHER E. KRUEGER Senior Assistant Attorney General DOUGLAS J. WOODS Supervising Deputy Attorney General /S/ Geoffrey L. Graybill GEOFFREY L. GRAYBILL Deputy Attorney General Attorneys for Defendant Edmund G. Brown Jr., Attorney General of the State of California

IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: 2/6/2009 /s/ John A. Mendez JUDGE, United States District Court Eastern District of California

28

SA2009307218

S T I P U L A T I O N TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT CASE NO: 2:08-cv-02064-JAM-KJM B Y AND BETWEEN PLAINTIFFS AND DEFENDANT BROWN; ORDER

3