Johnson v. U Save Auto Sales Inc. et al

Filing 17

ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 01/22/09 ORDERING sanctions be paid by Scott Johnson within 15 days in the amount of $500.00; Initial Scheduling Conference is reset for 3/16/2009 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GEB) before Judge Garland E. Burrell Jr; status report due no later than 14 days prior to the conference. (Manzer, C)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Plaintiff failed to respond to an OSC filed December 17, SCOTT N. JOHNSON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) U SAVE AUTO SALES INC., d/b/a ) U SAVE AUTO SALES; WILLARD PARKER,) Trustee of the Parker-Ewing ) Commercial Real Estate Defined ) Benefit Pension Plan, ) ) Defendants.1 ) ) 2:08-cv-02138-GEB-GGH ORDER TO PAY SANCTIONS AND CONTINUING STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) CONFERENCE IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 23 2008, to which he was required to respond no later than January 19, 24 2009. The OSC required Plaintiff to show cause why a sanction should 25 not be imposed for his failure to file a timely status report. 26 / / / 27 28 The case caption was changed to reflect the dismissal of Defendant Sandra K. Parker filed on January 9, 2009. 1 1 1 A sanction may be imposed under Federal Rule of Civil 2 Procedure 16(f) unless the judge finds the noncompliance with a filing 3 requirement "was substantially justified or that other circumstances" 4 show it should not issue. See Ayers v. City of Richmond, 895 F.2d 5 1267, 1269-70 (9th Cir. 1990) (upholding sanction where counsel failed 6 to appear for a settlement conference because the date "slipped by 7 him"); Ikerd v. Lacy, 852 F.2d 1256, 1258-59 (10th Cir. 1988) 8 ("Neither contumacious attitude nor chronic failure is a necessary 9 threshold to the imposition of sanctions under Rule 16 . . . ."). 10 The primary purpose of sanctions in the Rule 16 context "is 11 to insure reasonable management requirements for case preparation." 12 Matter of Sanction of Baker, 744 F.2d 1438, 1441 (10th Cir. 1984); see 13 also 1983 Advisory Committee Notes to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(f) ("[The] 14 explicit reference to sanctions reenforces the rule's intention to 15 encourage forceful judicial management."). Thus, violations of Rule 16 16 are not merely technical or trivial, but involve a "matter most 17 critical to the court itself: management of its docket," and the 18 avoidance of unnecessary delays and problems in the administration of 19 its cases. 20 Baker, 744 F.2d at 1441. Since Plaintiff failed to respond to the OSC and did not 21 file a timely status report Scott Johnson is sanctioned in the amount 22 of FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($500.00). Mr. Johnson shall pay the sanction 23 to the Clerk of the Court for this District within fifteen (15) days 24 from the date this Order is filed. 25 the "United States Treasury." The check shall be made payable to Proof of payment must be sent to the 26 undersigned judge's chambers within five (5) days of payment. 27 Further, the status hearing scheduled for February 2, 2009, 28 is rescheduled to commence at 9:00 a.m. on March 16, 2009. A status 2 1 report shall be filed no later than fourteen days prior to the status 2 conference. 3 4 Dated: 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. January 22, 2009 GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?