Haynes v. Sisto et al
Filing
62
ORDER signed by Circuit Judge Susan P. Graber on 2/24/2011 GRANTING 60 Defendants' request to conduct Plaintiff Robert Haynes' deposition via video conference is GRANTED. Nothing in this Order shall be interpreted as requiring the institution in which Plaintiff is housed to obtain video conferencing equipment if it is not already available. (cc: Warden SQSP) (Reader, L)
<![CDATA[
(PC) Haynes v. Sisto et al
Doc. 62
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -1Dockets.Justia.com
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
ROBERT HAYNES, Plaintiff,
CIV S-08-2177-SPG (PC) ORDER
vs. D.K. SISTO, T. SEQUIRA, V. SINGH, and J. TILTON, Defendants. ____________________________________/ Defendants' request to conduct Plaintiff Robert Haynes' deposition via videoconference is GRANTED. Nothing in this Order shall be interpreted as requiring the institution in which P laintiff is housed to obtain videoconferencing equipment if it is not already available. IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
February 24, 2011
/s/ Susan P. Graber UNITED STATES CIRCUIT JUDGE
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
