Johnson v. Autoville Service, Inc. et al
Filing
16
ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 2/2/09 ORDERING that the status conference is CONTINUED to 4/13/09 at 03:30 PM in Courtroom 4 (LKK) before Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton. (Engbretson, K.)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
SCOTT N. JOHNSON, ESQ., SBN 166952 DISABLED ACCESS PREVENTS INJURY, INC. 5150 FAIR OAKS BLVD., SUITE 101 PMB #253 CARMICHAEL, CA 95608-5758 TELEPHONE (916) 485-3516 FAX (916) 481-4224 E-MAIL scottnjohnson@comcast.net Attorney for Plaintiff Scott N. Johnson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) Autoville Service, Inc., et al, ) ) Defendants ) ) ) SCOTT N. JOHNSON
Case No.2:08-cv-02200-LKK-EFB PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST AND PROPOSED ORDER RE REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE OF STATUS CONFERENCE Status Conference: February 9, 2009 Time: 3:30 pm Courtroom: 4 hereby continue to March requests the 9, an
Plaintiff, extension conference of
Scott time in
N.
Johnson, to 2009
which 9,
status 2009.
from
February
Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint on January 6, 2009 adding an additional Defendant, Auto World, Inc. A
continuance to March 9, 2009 for the status conference will
PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST AND PROPOSED ORDER REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE OF STATUS CONFERENCE CIV: S-08-cv-02200-LKK-EFB - 1
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
give
the
Defendants
ample
time
to
answer
Plaintiff's
complaint. Dated: January 27, 2009 /s/Scott N. Johnson ____ Scott N. Johnson, Attorney for Plaintiff
ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the parties shall have the status conference continued to April 13, 2009 at 3:30 p.m. Date: February 2, 2009.
PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST AND PROPOSED ORDER REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE OF STATUS CONFERENCE CIV: S-08-cv-02200-LKK-EFB - 2
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?