Tyler v. Knowles et al
Filing
68
ORDER signed by District Judge Otis D. Wright, II on 2/19/2014 DISMISSING CASE. CASE CLOSED. (Michel, G)
JS-6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
ELONZA JESSE TYLER,
v.
Case No. 2:08-cv-02222-ODW
Plaintiff,
ORDER:
DISMISSING ACTION
MIKE E. KNOWLES and LORI
JOHNSON,
Defendants.
16
17
I.
INTRODUCTION
18
Elonza Jesse Tyler, a California prisoner, filed this action pro se and in forma
19
pauperis on September 19, 2008, alleging that several employees and officers of the
20
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation violated his rights under the
21
Americans with Disabilities Act.
22
Defendants’ motion seeking to have Tyler declared a vexatious litigant under
23
California Civil Procedure Code section 391(b)(1)(i) and Eastern District of California
24
Local Rule 65.1-151(b), on the basis that he had filed at least seven actions that were
25
determined adversely against him in the seven years immediately preceding this
26
action. (ECF No. 35.) As a result, the Court ordered that Tyler (1) was required
27
thereafter to seek leave of the presiding judge before filing any new litigation; and (2)
28
On December 30, 2010, this Court granted
1
must furnish an $850 security for the benefit of Defendants in this action as a
2
precondition to continuing with this case. (Id.)
3
Initially Tyler appealed that order but on February 5, 2014 voluntarily
4
dismissed his appeal [DE 67.] The court’s November 13, 2012 order requiring the
5
posting of $850 security remains a condition to maintaining this litigation. It has not
6
been paid and over a year has passed. It is the Plaintiff’s responsibility to diligently
7
prosecute his case. He has not done so and accordingly, this court orders this matter
8
dismissed.
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
10
11
February 19, 2014
12
13
14
____________________________________
OTIS D. WRIGHT, II
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?