Andrea Van Scoy, etal v. New Albertson's, Inc., etal

Filing 15

ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 2/10/2010 ORDERING the Court hereby grants the parties' request and modifies the current pre-trial scheduling order as follows: Discovery due by 8/2/2010; Designation of Expert Witnesses due by 9/8/2010; and motions for Summary Judgment filed by 11/1/2010. (Matson, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Jill E. Barwick, Esq. BARWICK LAW FIRM 1303 Jefferson Street, Suite 200A Napa, CA 94559 Telephone: (707) 258-1799 Attorney for Plaintiff Steven R. Blackburn State Bar No. 154797 Matthew A. Goodin State Bar No. 169674 EPSTEIN BECKER & GREEN, P.C. One California Street, 26th Floor San Francisco, California 94111-5427 Telephone: 415.398.3500 Facsimile: 415.398.0955 sblackburn@ebglaw.com mgoodin@ebglaw.com Attorneys for Defendant, SAVE MART SUPERMARKETS (successor in interest to ALBERTSONS INC. and ALBERTSONS LLC) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ANDREA VAN SCOY, LYNDA AZEVEDO, DIANA MURDOCK, CHRISTINA CARNES, MINA JO GUERRERO, MIRACLE JOHNSON, ROSANNE LAZUKA, PATRICIA LOGAN, TERESA LYON, THERESA ORTH, AND MARA GRACE SMITH, Plaintiff, v. NEW ALBERTSON'S, INC., ALBERTSON'S, INC., SAVE-MART SUPERMARKETS, INC., LUCKY'S INC.; and DOES 1 through 25 inclusive, Defendant. CASE NO. 2:08-cv-02237-MCE-DAD JOINT STIPULATION AND REQUEST TO MODIFY PRE-TRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER; ORDER THEREON The parties hereby jointly submit the following stipulation and request to modify certain portions of the Court's pre-trial scheduling order dated April 21, 2009: WHEREAS Plaintiff's counsel, Jill Barwick, was recently notified that her father is gravely and terminally ill; 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WHEREAS Plaintiff's counsel is a sole practitioner and needs to take some time off to care for her father and to administer his estate; that the day-to-day demands combined with the uncertainty of his final day, other than it being "imminent," have limited counsel's availability to participate in discovery during this time period. WHEREAS the parties in this matter have accordingly agreed to place discovery on hold in this matter until February 1, 2010; WHEREAS the discovery cutoff date in this matter is currently set for April 14, 2010, the expert discovery deadline is set for June 14, 2010, and the deadline for motions for summary judgment is set for August 13, 2010. The parties jointly respectfully request that these dates be continued for approximately four months. The parties do not request a continuance of the pretrial conference, trial date, or deadline for evidentiary and procedural motions, but consent to a continuation of those dates if the Court believes such is necessary. Respectfully submitted, DATED: December 23, 2009 BARWICK LAW FIRM By: /s/ Jill E. Barwick Attorneys for Plaintiffs DATED: December 23, 2009 EPSTEIN BECKER & GREEN, P.C. By: /s/ Steven R. Blackburn Matthew A. Goodin Attorneys for Defendant SAVE MART SUPERMARKETS -2- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER Upon reviewing the parties' Stipulation and request to modify pre-trial scheduling order, and good cause appearing therefor, the Court hereby grants the parties' request and modifies the current pre-trial scheduling order as follows: The current discovery cutoff date of April 14, 2010 is vacated. The new discovery cutoff date is August 2, 2010. The current expert discovery date of June 14, 2010 is vacated. The new expert discovery cutoff date is September 8, 2010. The current deadline for hearings on motions for summary judgment of August 13, 2010 is vacated. The new deadline for hearings on motions for summary judgment is November 1, 2010. All other dates in the Court's pre-trial scheduling order of April 21, 2009 remain unchanged. DATED: February 10, 2010 __________________________________ MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE -3-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?