Kirk v. Felker et al

Filing 11

ORDER signed by Circuit Judge Sidney Thomas on 4/9/2009 ORDERING that the 3 application to proceed IFP is granted; service is appropriate for defts Felker, Grannis, James and David; clerk shall send pltf 4 USM-285 forms, one summons, an instruction sheet and a copy of the complaint filed 2/5/2008; submission of documents due by 5/12/09. (Gaydosh, J)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. T. FELKER, et al., Defendants. / Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se. Plaintiff seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and has filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Plaintiff has submitted an in forma pauperis application that makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). Accordingly, plaintiff will be granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff is required to pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00 for this action. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) & 1915(b)(1). Plaintiff has been without funds for six months and is currently without funds. Accordingly, the court will not assess an initial partial filing fee. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). Plaintiff will be obligated to make monthly payments of twenty percent of the preceding month's income credited to plaintiff's prison trust account. These payments will be collected and forwarded by the appropriate agency to the Clerk of the Court each time the amount in plaintiff's account exceeds $10.00, until the filing fee is paid in full. See 28 U.S.C. § 1 ORDER IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JOHN MICHAEL KIRK, Plaintiff, No. 2:08-cv-02249-SRT 1915(b)(2). Plaintiff's complaint states a cognizable claim for relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and 1 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b). A "prisoner[] can establish an eighth amendment violation with respect to 2 medical care if [he] can prove there has been a deliberate indifference to [his] serious medical 3 needs." Hunt v. Dental Dept., 865 F.2d 198, 200 (9th Cir. 1989). Kirk's complaint contains an 4 arguable basis in law and fact, and if the allegations are proven, plaintiff has a reasonable 5 opportunity to prevail on the merits of his claim. 6 In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 7 1. Plaintiff's March 7, 2008 application to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. 8 2. Service is appropriate for the following defendants: Warden Felker, Chief Director of 9 Corrections N. Grannis, Dr. James, and Dr. David. 10 11 12 4. By Tuesday, May 12, 2009, plaintiff shall complete the attached Notice of Submission 13 of Documents and submit the following documents to the court: 14 a. The completed Notice of Submission of Documents; 15 b. One completed summons; 16 c. One completed USM-285 form for each defendant listed in number 2 above; 17 18 19 Upon receipt of the above-described documents, the court will direct the United States Marshal to 20 serve the above-named defendants pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4 without payment 21 of costs. 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 DATED: April 9, 2009 24 25 26 2 /s/ Sidney R. Thomas ______________________________________ Sidney R. Thomas, United States Circuit Judge Sitting by Designation d. 5 copies of the complaint filed February 5, 2008. 5. Plaintiff need not attempt service on defendants and need not request waiver of service. 3. The Clerk of the Court shall send plaintiff 4 USM-285 forms, one summons, an instruction sheet and a copy of the complaint filed February 5, 2008. 1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 JOHN MICHAEL KIRK, 9 Plaintiff, 10 vs. 11 T. FELKER, et al., 12 Defendants. 13 / 14 15 Plaintiff hereby submits the following documents in compliance with the court's 16 order filed 17 completed summons form 18 completed USM-285 forms 19 copies of the Complaint 20 DATED: 21 22 23 24 25 26 Plaintiff : OF DOCUMENTS NOTICE OF SUBMISSION No. 2:08-cv-02249-SRT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?