Yasin v. Coulter, et al.,
Filing
16
ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 01/16/2009 ORDERING Defendant California Alcohol Beverage Control Board's Motion to Dismiss 8 GRANTED without prejudice. (Streeter, J) Modified on 1/20/2009 (Streeter, J). Modified on 1/20/2009 (Krueger, M).
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 v. CHAD COULTER, et al., Defendants. ----oo0oo---BILAL ABDUL YASIN, Plaintiff, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ----oo0oo----
NO. CIV. 2:08-cv-2299 FCD GGH ORDER
This matter is before the court on defendant California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control's motion to dismiss because it is immune from suit in federal court pursuant to the Eleventh Amendment. Plaintiff Bilal Abdul Yasin does not oppose
the motion to the extent it is entered without prejudice to his right to refile in a court of competent jurisdiction. After a
review of the submissions and in light of plaintiff's nonopposition, defendant's motion to dismiss is GRANTED without prejudice. See Freeman v. Oakland Unified Sch. Dist., 179 F.3d
846, 847 (9th Cir. 1999) ("Dismissals for lack of jurisdiction
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
should be without prejudice so that a plaintiff may reassert his claim in a competent court.") (internal quotations omitted). IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: January 16, 2009
FRANK C. DAMRELL, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?