Natomas Gardens Investment Group LLC et al v. Sinadinos et al

Filing 361

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 12/13/2011 ORDERING that initial disclosures under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(1) shall be made no later than January 27, 2012. In light of the information which must be initially disc losed, the court finds that modification of the presumptive limit on the number of interrogatories allowed under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 33 is not warranted. The parties are allowed leave to conduct the depositions of the persons identified in the joint proposed discovery plan. Said depositions shall be completed by August 1, 2012, absent further order of the court. The limitation to depositions of deponents so identified is exclusive of later disclosed expert witnesses. The court does not find at this time that modification of the durational limit set forth in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(d)(1) is appropriate. This order is without prejudice to a properly noticed motion to extend the durational limit, made after completion o f seven hours of deposition and upon a particularized need for extended examination. A further status conference is set before the Honorable Lawrence K. Karlton on February 13, 2012 at 2:00 p.m. The parties are directed to file status reports fourteen (14) days prior to the status conference.(Duong, D)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 NATOMAS GARDENS INVESTMENT GROUP LLC, et al., 12 Plaintiffs, 13 CIV S-08-2308 LKK CKD vs. 14 JOHN SINADINOS, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 __________________________________/ 17 ORDER This matter has been referred to the undersigned for a discovery conference. See 18 dkt. no. 357. Upon review of the parties’ status reports and the joint scheduling report, and good 19 cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 20 21 1. Initial disclosures under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(1) shall be made no later than January 27, 2012. 22 2. In light of the information which must be initially disclosed, the court finds 23 that modification of the presumptive limit on the number of interrogatories allowed under 24 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 33 is not warranted. 25 ///// 26 ///// 1 1 3. The parties are allowed leave to conduct the depositions of the persons 2 identified in the joint proposed discovery plan.1 See dkt. no. 359 at 5:12-17; 6:8-18. Said 3 depositions shall be completed by August 1, 2012, absent further order of the court. The 4 limitation to depositions of deponents so identified is exclusive of later disclosed expert 5 witnesses. The court does not find at this time that modification of the durational limit set forth 6 in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(d)(1) is appropriate. This order is without prejudice to a 7 properly noticed motion to extend the durational limit, made after completion of seven hours of 8 deposition and upon a particularized need for extended examination. 9 4. A further status conference is set before the Honorable Lawrence K. Karlton on 10 February 13, 2012 at 2:00 p.m. The parties are directed to file status reports fourteen (14) days 11 prior to the status conference. 12 Dated: December 13, 2011 13 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 14 15 16 4 17 natomas.disc.ord 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 1 Said depositions must be properly noticed under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30. The court expects counsel and parties proceeding pro se to cooperate on the setting of dates for the depositions. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?