Natomas Gardens Investment Group LLC et al v. Sinadinos et al

Filing 402

STIPULATION and ORDER 401 signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 8/27/12 ORDERING Natomas Gardens Investment Group LLCs second amended complaint and all claims asserted therein, and the counterclaim filed by Larry Deane, are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Civil Case Terminated. CASE CLOSED.(Matson, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 LAW OFFICES OF S. CHANDLER VISHER S. Chandler Visher (California State Bar No. 52957) 44 Montgomery Street, Suite 3830 San Francisco, California 94104 Telephone: (415) 901-0500 Facsimile: (415) 901-0504 Email: chandler@visherlaw.com Attorneys for plaintiff Natomas Gardens Investment Group LLC 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 9 10 11 12 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA NATOMAS GARDENS INVESTMENT GROUP LLC, a California limited liability company, ORCHARD PARK DEVELOPMENT LLC, a California limited liability company, Plaintiffs, 13 14 15 16 Case No. 2:08-CV-02308-LKK-CKD STIPULATION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, RULE 4 (a) (1)(A)(ii) AND ORDER v. JOHN G. SINADINOS, et al. Defendants. 17 18 AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS 19 TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: 20 Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), Plaintiff NATOMAS 21 GARDENS INVESTMENT GROUP, LLC (hereinafter referenced as “Natomas”), by and 22 through its counsel, and all defendants (except Baljit and Harinder Johl, and Gus Galaxidas who 23 previously were dismissed from this action), including John G. Sinadinos, Stanley J. Foondos, 24 Stephen Foondos, Village Capital Group LLC, Vintage Creek LLC, South Watt & Florin 25 Partners, Chi-Sac Village Capital Investors LLC, Chi-Sac Florin Vineyards, Caselman & 26 Carlisle Partners, Chi-Sac Vintage Creek Investors, Inc., Chi-Sac Gap Investors, Prime Minister 27 Group LLC, Park Ridge Investments LLC, Chi-Sac South Sutter Investors, Chi-Sac White Rock 28 1 STIPULATION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF NATOMAS GARDENS INVESTMENT GROUP, LLC’S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No. 2:08-CV-02308-FCD-KJM-LEK-LKK 1 150 Investors LLC, Chicago South Watt Investors, LLC, Chicago Infill Investors LLC, Stewart 2 Title Company, Glenn Sorensen, Jr., Stockton & 65th, LP, Larry Deane, and Margarida Leavitt, 3 by and through their undersigned counsel (except Margarida Leavitt who has appeared in pro per 4 in the action and Stewart Title of Sacramento who is now appearing in pro per), stipulate to the 5 dismissal of all claims asserted by Natomas in the second amended complaint as follows: 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 WHEREAS, plaintiff Natomas has entered into entered into a settlement agreement attached hereto as Exhibit A with all remaining defendants; WHEREAS, plaintiff Natomas entered into a settlement agreement with Stewart Title of Sacramento on July 15, 2010, attached hereto as Exhibit B; WHEREAS, defendants Baljit and Harinder Johl were previously dismissed from this action via a motion to dismiss which was granted on May 12, 2009 (Docket # 123); WHEREAS, defendant Gus Galaxidas was previously dismissed from this action pursuant to stipulation on July 29, 2009 (Docket # 155); WHEREAS, the terms of the settlement agreements with all remaining defendants require Natomas to dismiss all of its claims asserted in this action; WHEREAS, defendant and counterclaimant Larry Deane has also agreed to the 17 settlement and, pursuant thereto, agrees to dismiss all claims asserted in his counterclaim; 18 WHEREAS, all parties stipulate to (i) the dismissal of Natomas’ second amended 19 complaint and all claims asserted therein as to all remaining defendants, and (ii) to the dismissal 20 of the counterclaim filed by Larry Deane. 21 STIPULATION 22 It is hereby stipulated by and between Natomas Gardens Investment Group, LLC (and for 23 itself alone) and all remaining defendants, listed above, to this action that the Second Amended 24 Complaint filed by Natomas Gardens Investment Group, LLC and all claims asserted therein, 25 and the counterclaim filed by defendant Larry Deane and all claims asserted therein, be 26 DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 27 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 28 2 STIPULATION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF NATOMAS GARDENS INVESTMENT GROUP, LLC’S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No. 2:08-CV-02308-FCD-KJM-LEK-LKK 1 2 Dated: August 24, 2012 Natomas Gardens Investment Group, LLC, a California limited liability company 3 4 By: 5 6 7 Dated: August 24, 2012 8 /s/ S. Chandler Visher S. Chandler Visher Attorney for Natomas Gardens Investment Group, LLC Larry Deane By: 9 10 /s/ Jason Burgess Jason W. Burgess Law Offices of Wanland, Burgess & Brenner 11 12 Dated: August 24, 2012 13 14 For All Defendants Except Larry Deane, Stewart Title of Sacramento, Village Capital Group LLC, Vintage Creek LLC & Margarida Leavitt 15 By: 16 17 ___/s/ Eric Garner______________ Eric Garner Kirkman Blaine Klomparens & Youmans LLP 18 19 Dated: August 24, 2012 Village Capital Group LLC and Vintage Creek LLC 20 By: 21 22 23 Dated: August 24, 2012 ___/s/ John Fairbrook___________ John D. Fairbrook Trainor Fairbrook Stewart Title of Sacramento 24 25 By: 26 27 28 Dated: August 24, 2012 /s/Paul Carillo Paul Carillo Chief Financial Officer Stewart Title of Sacramento Margarida Leavitt 3 STIPULATION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF NATOMAS GARDENS INVESTMENT GROUP, LLC’S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No. 2:08-CV-02308-FCD-KJM-LEK-LKK 1 2 By: 3 _/s/Margarida Leavitt__________________ Margarida Leavitt 4 5 6 7 ORDER 8 Based on the stipulation of the parties pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, Rule 9 10 11 12 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), Natomas Gardens Investment Group LLC’s second amended complaint and all claims asserted therein, and the counterclaim filed by Larry Deane, are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS SO ORDERED. 13 14 DATED: August 27, 2012 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 STIPULATION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF NATOMAS GARDENS INVESTMENT GROUP, LLC’S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No. 2:08-CV-02308-FCD-KJM-LEK-LKK

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?