Floyd v. Grannis
Filing
97
ORDER signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 3/28/2012 ORDERING 85 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS are ADOPTED in full; defendant Hasadri's 69 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED; and defendant Hasadri is DISMISSED from this action. (Waggoner, D)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
ANDRE RENE FLOYD,
11
12
13
14
Plaintiff,
vs.
N. GRANNIS, et al.,
Defendants.
15
16
No. CIV S-08-2346 WBS CKD P
ORDER
/
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action
17
seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate
18
Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
19
On December 2, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations
20
herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any
21
objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days.
22
Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.
23
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule
24
304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire
25
file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by
26
proper analysis.
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. The findings and recommendations filed December 2, 2011, are adopted in
3
full;
4
5
2. Defendant Hasadri’s November 5, 2010 motion for summary judgment is
granted; and
6
7
3. Defendant Hasadri is dismissed from this action.
DATED: March 28, 2012
8
9
10
11
12
13
floy2346.805(a)
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?