Castro v. Martel

Filing 30

ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 7/27/70 ORDERING that the findings and recommendations filed 7/1/10, are adopted in full; respondent's motion to dismiss 22 is denied; and respondent is directed to file an answer on the merits w/i 30 days. (Becknal, R)

Download PDF
(HC) Castro v. Martel Doc. 30 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. M. MARTEL, Respondent. / Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Eastern District of California local rules. On July 1, 2010, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file objections within a specified time. No objections to the findings and recommendations have been filed. The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the Magistrate Judge's analysis. /// /// 1 Dockets.Justia.com IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ANTHONY CASTRO, Petitioner, No. CIV S-08-2390-MCE-CMK-P ORDER 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. 2. 3. The findings and recommendations filed July 1, 2010, are adopted in full; Respondent's motion to dismiss (Doc. 22) is DENIED; and Respondent is directed to file an answer on the merits within 30 days. Dated: July 27, 2010 ________________________________ MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?