Gesburg v. LinkUs Enterprises, Inc.

Filing 51

ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 1/13/08 ORDERING that MOTION to STRIKE 8 , MOTION to DISMISS 12 , Anti-Slapp Motion to Strike 15 , MOTION to REMAND 24 are DENIED without prejudice and the parties are directed to re-file these Motions, should they so choose, if no settlement is reached. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Defendants. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 On January 9, 2009, based on their ongoing attempts at settlement, the parties to this action filed a stipulation and proposed order requesting that the Court continue the March 19, 2009, hearing dates on Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand (Docket No. 24) and Defendant's Motion to Strike (Docket No. 8), Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 12), and Anti-SLAPP Motion (Docket No. 15) until April 2, 2009. These Motions were originally calendared ----oo0oo---v. LINKUS ENTERPRISES, INC., and DOES 1-20, inclusive, ADAM GESBERG, KALEM SHISHIDO, individually and on behalf of all persons similarly situated, Plaintiffs, ORDER No. 2:08-cv-02428-MCE-CMK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA for hearing on December 5, 2008, and the parties stipulated to continue those hearings until December 19. 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 On December 15, 2009, the Court approved a second continuance, this time until the currently scheduled date in March. The Court is not willing to further continue the already scheduled hearings. Rather, each of the above Motions is denied without prejudice and the parties are directed to re-file these Motions, should they so choose, if no settlement is reached. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 13, 2009 _____________________________ MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?