Smith v. Stovall et al
Filing
99
ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 09/07/12 ORDERING that this matter is dropped from the court's trial calendar; this matter shall not proceed further unless and until plaintiff files a motion to proceed to trial; this order is without prejudice to defendants' right to oppose a motion to proceed to trial on the ground of, inter alia, unavailability of witnesses; and the Clerk is directed to administratively close this case. CASE ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSED (Benson, A.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
MICHEAL SMITH,
Plaintiff,
11
12
13
14
No. 2:08-cv-2492-LKK-JFM (PC)
vs.
R. STOVALL, et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER
/
15
16
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to
17
42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pursuant to court order, this matter came on for trial confirmation hearing on
18
September 4, 2012. Michael Smith appeared in propria persona. Misha Igra, Supervising
19
Deputy Attorney General, and William Downer, Deputy Attorney General, appeared as counsel
20
for defendants.
21
At the hearing, plaintiff requested voluntary dismissal of the action without
22
prejudice. In response to an inquiry from the court, plaintiff explained that his health precludes
23
him from proceeding to trial for an estimated period of three years.
24
25
26
After consideration of plaintiff’s statements and defendants’ response thereto, and
good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. This matter is dropped from the court’s trial calendar;
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
2. This matter shall not proceed further unless and until plaintiff files a motion to
proceed to trial;
3. This order is without prejudice to defendants’ right to oppose a motion to
proceed to trial on the ground of, inter alia, unavailability of witnesses; and
4. The Clerk of the Court is directed to administratively close this case.
DATED: September 7, 2012.
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?