Brooks v. Felker

Filing 44

ORDER and REVISED SCHEDULING ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 8/11/10 ORDERING that 42 Motion for Extension is partially granted. The 6/23/10 scheduling order is revised as follows: the discovery deadline is continued to 12/28/10; and the pretrial motions deadline is continued to 2/28/11.(Dillon, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2010; and //// 1 vs. T. FELKER, et al., Defendants. / On August 9, 2010, defendants Johnson, Runnels and Wong filed an answer. On August 9, 2010, defendants Felker, Johnson, Runnels and Wong filed a motion for an extension of time to complete discovery and to file pretrial motions. Defendants seek a five month extension of these deadlines. In light of the amendment of plaintiff's complaint and the addition of three new defendants, defendants' request will be partially granted. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Defendants' August 9, 2010 motion (dkt. no. 42) is partially granted. 2. The June 23, 2010 scheduling order is revised as follows: a. The October 25, 2010 discovery deadline is continued to December 28, ORDER AND REVISED SCHEDULING ORDER IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA STEVEN DEXTER BROOKS, Plaintiff, No. 2:08-cv-2512 FCD KJN P 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 broo2512.eot b. The January 25, 2011 pretrial motions deadline is continued to February 28, 2011. DATED: August 11, 2010 _____________________________________ KENDALL J. NEWMAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?