Oliver v. Wong et al

Filing 59

ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 9/27/2012 ORDERING that the 55 findings and recommendations are ADOPTED in full. Plaintiff's 48 motion for summary judgment is DENIED. Defendant's 47 motion for judgment on the pleadings is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART, leaving only plaintiff's retaliation claim at issue. The court shall set a further schedule for trial on the remaining issues. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMES OLIVER, Plaintiff, 11 12 13 14 vs. SCOTT CHESSER, Defendant. ORDER / 15 16 No. 2:08-cv-2524 LKK GGH P Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action 17 seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 18 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 19 On August 10, 2012, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations 20 herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any 21 objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. On 22 September 13, 2012, the court additionally granted plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time to 23 file an objection. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 24 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 25 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 26 ORDERED that: 1 1 1. The findings and recommendations filed August 10, 2012, are adopted in full; 2 2. Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 48) is denied; 3 3. Defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings (Doc. No. 47) is granted in 4 5 6 part and denied in part, leaving only plaintiff’s retaliation claim at issue; and 4. The court shall set a further schedule for trial on the remaining issues. DATED: September 27, 2012. 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?