Solomon v. Felker et al
Filing
80
ORDER signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 11/3/11 ADOPTING in full 72 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Plaintiff's 65 motion for emergency transfer is DENIED; plaintiff's 66 motion for emergency injunction is DENIED; plaintiff's 67 motion for emergency injunction is DENIED, and plaintiff's 69 motion for emergency injunction is DENIED. (Kastilahn, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
VINCENT J. SOLOMON,
Plaintiff,
11
12
13
14
vs.
LIEUTENANT SCHIRMER, et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER
/
15
16
No. 2:08-cv-2544 WBS JFM (PC)
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action
17
seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate
18
Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
19
On August 15, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations
20
herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any
21
objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. By order
22
filed September 9, 2011, plaintiff received a thirty day extension of time to file objections.
23
Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.
24
The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
25
supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY
26
ORDERED that:
1
1
1. The findings and recommendations filed August 15, 2011, are adopted in full;
2
2. Plaintiff’s March 10, 2011 motion for emergency transfer is denied.
3
3. Plaintiff’s April 25, 2011 motion for emergency injunction is denied.
4
4. Plaintiff’s May 10, 2011 motion for emergency injunction is denied.
5
5. Plaintiff’s June 24, 2011 motion for emergency injunction is denied.
6
DATED: November 3, 2011
7
8
9
10
11
12
/solo2544.801
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?