Solomon v. Felker et al
Filing
98
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 10/18/12 ORDERING that the fourth amended complaint is deemed amended to change the spelling of the defendant identified therein as Hutchingson to Hutchinson; and Defendant Hutchinson shall respond to the fourth amended complaint with the other defendants as set forth in this courts order filed September 27, 2012.(Dillon, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
VINCENT J. SOLOMON,
11
12
13
14
Plaintiff,
vs.
LIEUTENANT SCHIRMER, et al.,
Defendants.
15
16
No. 2:08-cv-2544 JFM P
ORDER
/
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to
17
42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding before a United States Magistrate Judge with the
18
consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). See Order filed February 8, 2012.
19
By order filed September 27, 2012, counsel for defendants was directed to inform
20
the court in writing within twenty days whether counsel would accept service of the fourth
21
amended complaint on behalf of defendant Hutchingson. On October 17, 2012, counsel filed a
22
response indicating that counsel will accept service of process on behalf of said defendant.
23
Counsel represents that said defendant’s last name is Hutchinson, and requests that defendant
24
Hutchinson be permitted to respond to the fourth amended complaint with the other defendants.
25
That will be the order of the court.
26
In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1
1
2
1. The fourth amended complaint is deemed amended to change the spelling of
the defendant identified therein as Hutchingson to Hutchinson; and
3
2. Defendant Hutchinson shall respond to the fourth amended complaint with the
4
other defendants as set forth in this court’s order filed September 27, 2012.
5
DATED: October 18, 2012.
6
7
8
9
10
12
solo2544.accsvc
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?