Vang v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 26

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 12/23/09 ORDERING that Defendant's time to respond to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment is extended from 12/21/09 to 1/06/10.(Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER Acting United States Attorney LUCILLE GONZALES MEIS Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX Social Security Administration THEOPHOUS H. REAGANS Special Assistant United States Attorney 333 Market Street, Suite 1500 San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: (415) 977-8938 Facsimile: (415) 744-0134 E-Mail: Theophous.Reagans@ssa.gov Attorneys for Defendant UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION MAI VANG, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, ) Commissioner of ) Social Security, ) ) Defendant. ) _________________________________) CIVIL NO. 2:08-CV-02557-DAD STIPULATION FOR SECOND EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; ORDER The parties, through their respective counsel, stipulate that defendant's time to respond to plaintiff's motion for summary judgment be extended from December 21, 2009 to January 6, 2009. Counsel needs additional time to review the record and draft a response. Respectfully submitted this 23rd day of December 2009. DATED: December 23, 2009 By: /s/Bess M. Brewer (As agreed via email) BESS M. BREWER Attorney at Law Attorney for Plaintiff 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Ddad1\orders.soc sec\vang2557.eot2.dft BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney DATED: December 23, 2009 /s/ Theophous H. Reagans THEOPHOUS H. REAGANS Special Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorneys for Defendant Pursuant to stipulation, IT IS ORDERED that defendant's time to respond to plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is extended from December 21, 2009, to January 6, 2010. DATED: December 28, 2009. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?