Vang v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 35

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 12/3/10 ORDERING that Plaintiff's Petition for Attorney's Fees is EXTENDED until 12/12/2010. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
(SS) Vang v. Commissioner of Social Security Doc. 35 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney LUCILLE GONZALES MEIS Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX Social Security Administration THEOPHOUS H. REAGANS, SBN 189450 Special Assistant United States Attorney 333 Market Street, Suite 1500 San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: (415) 977-8938 Facsimile: (415) 744-0134 E-Mail: Theophous.Reagans@ssa.gov Attorneys for Defendant UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION MAI VANG, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, ) Commissioner of ) Social Security, ) ) Defendant. ) _________________________________) NO. 2:08-CV-2557-DAD STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME The parties, through their respective counsel, stipulate that the time for responding to Plaintiff's Petition for Attorney's Fees be extended until December 12, 2010. This is Defendant's first request for an extension of time to respond to Plaintiff's petition. Counsel apologizes to the Court for any inconvenience caused by this delay. Respectfully submitted, Dated: November 29, 2010 /s/ Bess M. Brewer BESS M. BREWER Attorney for Plaintiff Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: November 29, 2010 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney LUCILLE GONZALES MEIS Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX Social Security Administration /s/ Theophous H. Reagans THEOPHOUS H. REAGANS Special Assistant United States Attorney IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: December 3, 2010. Ddad1\orders.socsec\vang2557.eotafmot.dft 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?