Wallis et al v. Centennial Insurance Company Inc et al

Filing 216

ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 3/29/2013: Plaintiffs' First Amend Complaint is hereby ordered STRICKEN, and plaintiffs are given seven days from the date of this Order to file an amended complaint consistent with this Order and the court's February 28, 2013 Order. Defendants' ex parte application to extend the trial date, dispositive motion cutoff, discovery completion, and discovery motion dates 215 is therefore DENIED as moot. (Kirksey Smith, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ----oo0oo---11 12 13 DALE M. WALLIS, D.V.M., JAMES L. WALLIS, and HYGIEIA BIOLOGICAL LABORATORIES, INC., a California Corporation, NO. CIV. 08-02558 WBS GGH ORDER 14 Plaintiffs, 15 v. 16 17 18 CENTENNIAL INSURANCE COMPANY, INC., a New York corporation, ATLANTIC MUTUAL INSURANCE, CO., INC., a New York corporation, 19 Defendants, 20 21 22 / AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS AND THIRD-PARTY COMPLAINT. / 23 ----oo0oo---24 On February 28, 2013, the court granted defendant 25 Atlantic Mutual’s motion for judgment on the pleadings. (Feb. 26 28, 2013 Order (Docket No. 212).) The court allowed plaintiffs 27 twenty days from the date of the Order to file an amended 28 1 1 complaint “consistent with [the] Order.” 2 added).) 3 (“FAC”) on March 20, 2013 (Docket No. 214), defendants submitted 4 an ex parte application to extend the trial date, dispositive 5 motion cutoff, discovery completion, and discovery motion dates 6 based upon the fact that the FAC added new claims. 7 215.) 8 9 (Id. at 20 (emphasis After plaintiffs filed a First Amended Complaint (Docket No. The court granted plaintiffs leave to amend to remedy the deficiencies in the pleading of their existing claims, not 10 for the purpose of adding new claims. Upon review of the FAC, it 11 is clear that plaintiffs have gone beyond that limited purpose. 12 Plaintiffs’ FAC is therefore hereby ordered STRICKEN, 13 and plaintiffs are given seven days from the date of this Order 14 to file an amended complaint consistent with this Order and the 15 court’s February 28, 2013 Order. 16 application to extend the trial date, dispositive motion cutoff, 17 discovery completion, and discovery motion dates is therefore 18 DENIED as moot. 19 DATED: Defendants’ ex parte March 29, 2013 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?