Johnson v. CE Restaurant & Bar Inc. et al

Filing 10

ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 1/6/09 ORDERING dfts Bella Bru Coffee Company and CE Restaurant & Bar Inc. DISMISSED pursuant to FRCP 41 (a)(2). Case to remain open with remaining dfts. (Engbretson, K.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SCOTT N. JOHNSON, ESQ., SBN 166952 DISABLED ACCESS PREVENTS INJURY, INC. 5150 FAIR OAKS BLVD., SUITE 101 PMB #253 CARMICHAEL, CA 95608-5758 TELEPHONE (916) 485-3516 FAX (916) 481-4224 E-MAIL scottnjohnson@comcast.net Attorney for Plaintiff Scott N. Johnson IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case No.: CIV.S 08-cv-02563-JAM-DAD PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL OF CE RESTAURANT & BAR, INC.; BELLA BRU COFFEE COMPANY AND ORDER SCOTT N. JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. CE Restaurant & Bar, Inc., et al, Complaint Filed: OCTOBER 28, 2008 Defendants CASE TO REMAIN OPEN WITH REMAINING DEFENDANTS IT IS HEREBY REQUESTED by Plaintiff, Scott N. Johnson, that Defendants (CE Restaurant & Bar, Inc.; Bella Bru Coffee Company) be and are hereby dismissed WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to FRCP 41 (a)(2). This case is to remain open with remaining Defendants. Defendants (CE Restaurant & Bar, Inc.; Bella Bru Coffee Company) are dismissed because Plaintiff and these Defendants have settled their dispute. Dated: January 6, 2009 /s/Scott N. Johnson____________ SCOTT N. JOHNSON Attorney for Plaintiff 1 PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL and Proposed ORDER CIV: S-08-02563-JAM-DAD PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 6, 2009 /s/ John A. Mendez_______________ U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE 2 PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL and Proposed ORDER CIV: S-08-02563-JAM-DAD PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?