Barboza v. California Association of Professional Firefighters, Long-Term Disability Plan et al

Filing 90

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 10/27/10. Motion Hearing re-set for 12/3/2010 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 2 (FCD) before Judge Frank C. Damrell Jr as to 41 Motion for Summary Judgment ; 47 Motion for Summary Judgment ; 61 Motion for Sanctions; 69 Motion to Modify the pretrial scheduling order. (Williams, D)

Download PDF
Barboza v. California Association of Professional Firefighters, Long-Term Disability Plan et al Doc. 90 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 GEOFFREY V. WHITE (SBN. 068012) LAW OFFICE OF GEOFFREY V. WHITE 351 California St., Suite 1500 San Francisco, California 94104 Telephone: (415) 362-5658 Facsimile: (415) 362-4115 Email: gvwhite@sprynet.com Attorneys for Plaintiff DAVID BARBOZA LOUIS A. GONZALEZ, JR. (SBN 157373) BRENDAN J. BEGLEY (SBN 202563) WEINTRAUB GENSHLEA CHEDIAK 400 Capitol Mall, 11th Flr. Telephone: (916) 558-6000 Facsimile: (916) 446-1611 Attorneys for Defendants, CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF PROFESSIONAL FIREFIGHTERS, CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF PROFESSIONAL FIREFIGHTERS LONG-TERM DISABILITY PLAN; and CALIFORNIA ADMINISTRATION INSURANCE SERVICES, INC. and KENNETH BLANTON, DENNIS CAMPANALE, GENE DANGEL, JAMES FLOYD, CHARLES GLUCK, BRIAN PINOMAKI, and WILLIAM SOQUI, Individually and as Plan Directors UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA DAVID BARBOZA, v. Plaintiff, CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF PROFESSIONAL FIREFIGHTERS, et al., Defendants. ___________________________________ ) Case No. CIV. S-08-02569 FCD GGH ) ) STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: ) CONTINUATION OF HEARING DATE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Stipulation and Order Re Continuation of Hearing - Case No. CIV S-08-02569 FCD GGH -1 - Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WHEREAS due to a conflict with the Court's calendar, the Court issued its Minute Order vacating and resetting the hearings currently set for Friday, October 22, 2010, to Friday, November 12, 2010, at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 2; WHEREAS attorney for Defendants, Louis A. Gonzalez, Jr., is unavailable on November 12, 2010, due to a calendar conflict requiring his presence in a different civil action; THEREFORE, THE PARTIES STIPULATE that good cause exists for continuing the hearings on Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, Defendants' motion for summary judgment, Defendants' Rule 11 sanctions motion, and Defendants' motion to modify the pretrial scheduling order from November 12, 2010, to December 3, 2010, at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 2. Dated: October 27, 2010 LAW OFFICE OF GEOFFREY V. WHITE By /S/ Geoffrey V. White (authorized 10/27/10) Geoffrey V. White, Attorney for Plaintiff DAVID BARBOZA Dated: October 27, 2010 WEINTRAUB GENSHLEA CHEDIAK By: /S/ Brendan J. Begley Brendan J. Begley Attorneys for Defendants CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF PROFESSIONAL FIREFIGHTERS, CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF PROFESSIONAL FIREFIGHTERS LONG-TERM DISABILITY PLAN; CALIFORNIA ADMINISTRATION INSURANCE SERVICES, INC., KENNETH BLANTON, DENNIS CAMPANALE, GENE DANGEL, JAMES, FLOYD, CHARLES GLUCK, BRIAN PINOMAKI and WILLIAM SOQUI. Stipulation and Order Re Scheduling Order - Case No. CIV S-08-02569 FCD GGH -2- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DATE: October 27, 2010 ORDER IT IS SO ORDERED that the hearings on Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, Defendants' motion for summary judgment, Defendants' Rule 11 sanctions motion, and Defendants' motion to modify the pretrial scheduling order, all of which are currently set for November 12, 2010, shall be continued to December 3, 2010 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 2. _______________________________________ FRANK C. DAMRELL, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Stipulation and Order Re Scheduling Order - Case No. CIV S-08-02569 FCD GGH -3-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?