Wilson v. First Franklin Financial Corp.

Filing 77

ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr. on 11/29/2010 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 76 are ADOPTED in FULL; Plaintiff's second amended complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to the provisions of 28:1367(c); Defendants' 54 motion to dismiss is DENIED; and Defendants' 56 motion to strike is DENIED. (Reader, L)

Download PDF
(PS) Wilson v. First Franklin Financial Corp. et al Doc. 77 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 full; and 1 Dockets.Justia.com IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA BEVERLY J. WILSON, Plaintiff, vs. FIRST FRANKLIN FINANCIAL CORP., Defendant. / Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 72-302(c)(21). On November 3, 2010, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within ten days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The findings and recommendations filed November 3, 2010 are adopted in ORDER No. 2:08-cv-2572 FCD JFM PS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2. Plaintiff's second amended complaint is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c); 2. Defendants' motion to dismiss is denied; and 3. Defendants' motion to strike is denied. DATED: November 29, 2010. _______________________________________ FRANK C. DAMRELL, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?