Aidnik v. California Medical Facility et al

Filing 102

ORDER signed by Senior Judge Howard D. McKibben on 11/18/10 ORDERING pltf's motion for discovery 92 is DENIED. (Carlos, K)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Plaintiff has filed a motion for discovery seeking copies of 22 certain investigative reports (#92). 23 examined those documents. 24 denied. 25 should advise the attorney for the defendant. If a mutually 26 agreeable date and time cannot be reached for plaintiff's further 27 review of those documents, and if he needs to do so before trial, 28 1 If plaintiff needs to examine the documents again, he Accordingly, the motion for discovery is The plaintiff has already JEFF AIDNIK, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) CALIFORNIA MEDICAL FACILITY, et ) al., ) ) Defendants. ) _________________________________ ) 2:08-cv-02583-HDM-RAM ORDER UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

plaintiff can petition the court to consider whether or not he should be entitled to another inspection of the documents. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: This 18th day of November, 2010.

____________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2