Aidnik v. California Medical Facility et al
Filing
135
ORDER signed by Senior Judge Howard D. McKibben on 8/15/2011 ORDERING that plt's 133 134 motions are granted in part. The clerk of the court is directed to send plaintiff a copy of the courts 122 order setting the settlement conference. Th e motions are denied in all other respects. The court advises plaintiff that it has issued a writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum requiring that he be produced for the September 1, 2011, settlement conference, and that authorities at Avenal State Prison are aware of the order and have a copy of the writ. Plaintiff's remaining claims are outside the scope of this action and are therefore DENIED. (Duong, D)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
JEFF AIDNIK,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
CALIFORNIA MEDICAL FACILITY, et )
al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
_________________________________ )
21
2:08-cv-02583-HDM-RAM
ORDER
Plaintiff has filed two motions asking, among other things,
22
that the court resend its order scheduling the September 1, 2011,
23
settlement conference (#133, #134).
24
part.
25
of the court’s order setting the settlement conference (#122).
26
motions are denied in all other respects.
27
plaintiff that it has issued a writ of habeas corpus ad
28
testificandum requiring that he be produced for the September 1,
The motions are granted in
The clerk of the court is directed to send plaintiff a copy
1
The
The court advises
1
2011, settlement conference, and that authorities at Avenal State
2
Prison are aware of the order and have a copy of the writ.
3
Plaintiff’s remaining claims are outside the scope of this action
4
and are therefore denied.
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
DATED: This 15th day of August, 2011.
7
8
____________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?