Aidnik v. California Medical Facility et al

Filing 135

ORDER signed by Senior Judge Howard D. McKibben on 8/15/2011 ORDERING that plt's 133 134 motions are granted in part. The clerk of the court is directed to send plaintiff a copy of the courts 122 order setting the settlement conference. Th e motions are denied in all other respects. The court advises plaintiff that it has issued a writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum requiring that he be produced for the September 1, 2011, settlement conference, and that authorities at Avenal State Prison are aware of the order and have a copy of the writ. Plaintiff's remaining claims are outside the scope of this action and are therefore DENIED. (Duong, D)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 JEFF AIDNIK, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) CALIFORNIA MEDICAL FACILITY, et ) al., ) ) Defendants. ) _________________________________ ) 21 2:08-cv-02583-HDM-RAM ORDER Plaintiff has filed two motions asking, among other things, 22 that the court resend its order scheduling the September 1, 2011, 23 settlement conference (#133, #134). 24 part. 25 of the court’s order setting the settlement conference (#122). 26 motions are denied in all other respects. 27 plaintiff that it has issued a writ of habeas corpus ad 28 testificandum requiring that he be produced for the September 1, The motions are granted in The clerk of the court is directed to send plaintiff a copy 1 The The court advises 1 2011, settlement conference, and that authorities at Avenal State 2 Prison are aware of the order and have a copy of the writ. 3 Plaintiff’s remaining claims are outside the scope of this action 4 and are therefore denied. 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 DATED: This 15th day of August, 2011. 7 8 ____________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?