Roberts v. Cate et al
ORDER denying 57 Motion to Compel signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 06/29/11. (Plummer, M)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
No. 2:08-cv-2624 KJN P
MATTHEW CATE, et al.,
Plaintiff is proceeding without counsel. On June 22, 2011, the parties were
reminded that discovery closed on June 8, 2011, but that once the court issued a ruling on
defendants’ motion for protective order, plaintiff could renew his motion to extend the discovery
deadline. On June 27, 2011, plaintiff filed a motion to compel discovery responses, which
plaintiff signed on June 20, 2011, prior to the issuance of the June 22, 2011 order. Plaintiff’s
motion to compel is untimely and will be denied without prejudice to its renewal should the court
subsequently grant an extension of the discovery deadline. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that
plaintiff’s June 27, 2011 motion to compel (dkt. no. 57) is denied without prejudice.
DATED: June 29, 2011
KENDALL J. NEWMAN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?