CytoSport, Inc. v. Vital Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Filing
188
ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 5/3/12 ORDERING that the existing pretrial deadlines are modified as follows: Depositions Completed 6/8/12, Dispositive Motion Filing Deadline 6/12/12, Oppositions to Dispositive Motions Due 6/26/12, Replies in Support of Dispositive Motions Due 7/3/12, Dispositive Motion Hearing Date 7/11/12 at 9:30 a.m., Joint Pretrial Statement Due 8/24/12, Final Pretrial Conference set for 8/31/2012 at 11:00 a.m., and Trial set for 10/15/12 at 9:00 a.m.. (Kastilahn, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA,
12
(SACRAMENTO DIVISION)
13
14
CYTOSPORT, INC., a California
corporation,
15
Plaintiff,
16
17
18
ORDER MODIFYING PRETRIAL
DATES
Case No.: 2:08-CV-02632-JAM-GGH
v.
VITAL PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., a
Florida Corporation,
19
20
Defendant.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING PRETRIAL DATES
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
1
2
The Court, having reviewed the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing, hereby
ORDERS the existing pretrial deadlines are modified as follows:
3
4
Event
Current Date
New Date
5
Depositions Completed
3/23/12
6/8/12
6
Dispositive Motion Filing Deadline
5/9/12
6/12/12
7
Oppositions to Dispositive Motions Due
5/23/12
6/26/12
8
Replies in Support of Dispositive Motions
Due
5/30/12
7/3/12
10
Dispositive Motion Hearing Date
6/6/12 at 9:30 a.m.
7/11/12 at 9:30 a.m.
11
Joint Pretrial Statement Due
7/27/12
8/24/12
12
Final Pretrial Conference
8/13/12
8/31/12 at 11:00 a.m.
13
Trial
10/15/12 at 9:00 a.m.
10/15/12 at 9:00 a.m.
9
14
15
16
17
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: 5/3/2012
/S/John A. Mendez_______________________
JOHN A. MENDEZ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING PRETRIAL DATES
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?