CytoSport, Inc. v. Vital Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Filing 49

STIPULATION and ORDER 46 for page-limit extension signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr. on 4/20/2009. Defendant VPX may file an Opposition Brief to CytoSport's Motion for Preliminary Injunction of up to 40 pages in length. Further, both parties agree to a 21-page extension for CS's Brief that is on file supporting its Motion for Preliminary Injunction. (Marciel, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Gigi C. Hoang, Bar No. 241182 GHoang@perkinscoie.com Jason A. Yurasek, Bar No. 202131 JYurasek@perkinscoie.com PERKINS COIE LLP Four Embarcadero Center, Suite 2400 San Francisco, CA 94111-4131 Telephone: 415.344.7000 Facsimile: 415.344.7050 Ramsey M. Al-Salam (Admitted pro hac vice) RAlsalam@perkinscoie.com PERKINS COIE LLP 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 4800 Seattle, WA 98101-3099 Telephone: 206.359.8000 Facsimile: 206.359.9000 Erica W. Stump (Admitted pro hac vice) ericas@vpxsports.com VITAL PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. 15751 S.W. 41st Street, Suite 300 Davie, FL 33331 Telephone: 951.641.0570 x 293 Facsimile: 954.641.0583 Attorneys for Defendant Vital Pharmaceuticals, Inc. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION CYTOSPORT, INC., Plaintiff, v. VITAL PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., Defendant. Case No. 2:08-cv-02632-FCD-GGH STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING PAGE-LIMIT EXTENSION FOR PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND OPPOSITION THERETO WHEREAS, the Court, in its November 5, 2008 Order, ordered that all motions and opposition briefs should be limited to 20 pages; 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WHEREAS, Defendant Vital Pharmaceuticals, Inc. ("VPX") desires a 20-page extension for its opposition brief to CytoSport, Inc.'s (CytoSport's) Motion for Preliminary Injunction due to the complexity and number of issues involved in the motion and VPX's opposition, the seriousness of CytoSport's motion to enjoin VPX from selling its product, and the length of CytoSport's Motion for Preliminary Injunction, which was 41 pages; NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between CytoSport and VPX, by and through their respective attorneys of record, that VPX may file an opposition brief to CytoSport's Motion for Preliminary Injunction of up to 40 pages in length. Further, both Parties agree to a 21-page extension for CS's brief that is on file supporting its Motion for Preliminary Injunction. DATED: April 17, 2009. /s/ Ramsey M. Al-Salam Ramsey M. Al-Salam (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) RAlsalam@perkinscoie.com PERKINS COIE LLP 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 4800 Seattle, WA 98101-3099 Telephone: 206.359.8000 Facsimile: 206.359.9000 Erica W. Stump (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) ericas@vpxsports.com VITAL PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. 15751 S.W. 41st Street, Suite 300 Davie, FL 33331 Telephone: 951.641.0570 x 293 Facsimile: 954.641.0583 Gigi C. Hoang, Bar No. 241182 GHoang@perkinscoie.com Jason A. Yurasek, Bar No. 202131 JYurasek@perkinscoie.com PERKINS COIE, LLP Four Embarcadero Center, Suite 2400 San Francisco, CA 94111-4131 Telephone: 415.344.7000 Facsimile: 415.344.7050 Attorneys for Defendant Vital Pharmaceuticals, Inc. -2- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: April 20, 2009 /s/ Jed H. Hansen (as authorized on April 16, 2009) hansen@tnw.com Peter M. de Jonge Gordon K. Hill THORPE NORTH & WESTERN, L.L.P. 8180 South 700 East, Suite 350 Sandy, UT 84070 Telephone: 801.566.6633 Facsimile: 801.566.0750 Glenn W. Peterson, Esq. gpeterson@mpwlaw.net MILLSTONE, PETERSON & WATTS, LLP 2267 Lava Ridge Court, Suite 210 Roseville, CA 95661 Mark M. Bettilyon mbettilyon@rqn.com RAY QUINNEY & NEBEKER, PC 36 South State Street, Suite 1400 Salt Lake City, UT 84111 Attorneys for Plaintiff CytoSport, Inc. _______________________________________ FRANK C. DAMRELL, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE -3-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?