Mercado, et al. v. Sandoval, Inc., et al

Filing 34

ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 4/15/2009 ORDERING 32 Stipulation and Proposed Order to continue deadline for filing initial disclosures is DENIED. (Matson, R)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 MOISES MERCADO; and MARCO A. RAMIREZ, Plaintiffs, ) ) ) ) v. ) ) SANDOVAL, INC., a California ) Corporation; MARCHINI LAND CO., a ) California General Partnership; ) BRUNO P. MARCHINI, individually and) d/b/a Marchini Land Co.; RICHARD B.) MARCHINI, individually and d/b/a ) Marchini Land Co.; VINCENT M. ) MARCHINI, individually and d/b/a ) Marchini Land Co.; and ROSETTA ) MARCHINI, individually and d/b/a ) Marchini Land Co., ) ) Defendants. ) ) 2:08-cv-2648-GEB-EFB ORDER

On April 9, 2009, the parties filed a stipulation and proposed order in which they seek to continue their agreed upon deadline for filing initial disclosures, which was set by the parties in their Joint Status Report filed on January 20, 2009. However,

under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(1)(C), "a different time" for initial disclosures may be "set by stipulation or court order." Since the parties' April 9, 2009 stipulation agrees to set a different 1

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

time for initial disclosures, and the parties have not shown the necessity for a court order approving that stipulation, their request for a court order is denied. Dated: April 15, 2009

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. United States District Judge

2