Gridley v. Hartley

Filing 22

ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 08/28/09 ORDERING that the court construes petitioner's 20 Objections as a request for reconsideration of the magistrate judge's 18 order; upon reconsideration, the order is AFFIRMED. (Streeter, J)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. JAMES D. HARTLEY, Respondent. / On August 17, 2009, petitioner filed "objections" to the magistrate judge's order filed July 31, 2009, denying petitioner's request for the appointment of counsel. The court construes petitioner's "objections" as a request for reconsideration of the magistrate judge's order. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 72-303(f), a magistrate judge's orders shall be upheld unless "clearly erroneous or contrary to law." Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge's ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law. /// /// /// ///
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DANIEL HARVEY GRIDLEY, Petitioner,

No. 2:08-cv-02659-MCE-EFB P

ORDER

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the magistrate judge filed July 31, 2009, is affirmed. Dated: August 28, 2009 ________________________________ MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2