Hollis v. Sloan, et al

Filing 52

ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 09/30/10 ADOPTING in full 47 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS; GRANTING in part 37 Motion to Dismiss ; Defendants motion to dismiss plaintiffs Eighth Amendment claims forinjunctive relief, and request t o appoint a receiver, is granted; Defendants motion to dismiss plaintiffs Eighth Amendment claims for damages is denied;5. Defendants motion to dismiss defendants Cummings and Acquaviva is denied;6. Plaintiffs claim for injunctive relief against defe ndants at High Desert State Prison, based on his retaliation claims, is denied; and this action shall proceed on plaintiffs Eighth Amendment claims for damages, including his claim for damages based on the alleged breach of mental health confidentiality, and plaintiffs retaliation claims, as set forth in the July 28, 2010 findings and recommendations. (Williams, D)

Download PDF
(PC) Hollis v. Sloan, et al Doc. 52 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 1 Dockets.Justia.com IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MARVIN GLENN HOLLIS, Plaintiff, vs. PHILLIP SLOAN, et al., Defendants. / Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On July 28, 2010, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. //// ORDER No. 2:08-cv-2674 GEB KJN P 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 denied; granted; Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The findings and recommendations filed July 28, 2010 (Dkt. No. 47) are adopted in full; 2. Defendants' September 23, 2009 motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 37) is partially 3. Defendants' motion to dismiss plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claims for injunctive relief, and request to appoint a receiver, is granted; 4. Defendants' motion to dismiss plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claims for damages is denied; 5. Defendants' motion to dismiss defendants Cummings and Acquaviva is 6. Plaintiff's claim for injunctive relief against defendants at High Desert State Prison, based on his retaliation claims, is denied; and 7. This action shall proceed on plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claims for damages, including his claim for damages based on the alleged breach of mental health confidentiality, and plaintiff's retaliation claims, as set forth in the July 28, 2010 findings and recommendations. Dated: September 30, 2010 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2 GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?