Charlson, et al., v. Carson Helicopters, Inc., et al.,
Filing
44
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 4/8/09 ORDERING that motions 10 13 20 are deemed WITHDRAWN, and may be re-noticed for hearing after the Panel has decided the transfer issue. (Attachments: # 1 Letter from MDL) (Duong, D)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Plaintiffs, 14 v. 15 CARSON HELICOPTERS, INC., et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RICHARD CHARLSON, on behalf of THE ESTATE OF SCOTT CHARLSON; RICHARD CHARLSON, individually; NINA CHARLSON, individually, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
2:08-CV-2756-GEB-KJM ORDER
Pending are Defendant Carson Helicopters, Inc.'s motion to strike, motion for more definite statement, and motion to dismiss, which are set for hearing on April 20, 2009. However, on March 31,
2009, the undersigned judge received the attached letter from the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. The letter
states "[p]resently before the Panel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407 is a motion to transfer which includes [this action]," and that the undersigned judge "may wish to wait [on ruling on any pending motion] until the Panel has decided the transfer issue." // // 1 Accordingly, the
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
motions are deemed withdrawn, and may be re-noticed for hearing after the Panel has decided the transfer issue. Dated: April 8, 2009
GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?