Handy v. Williams et al

Filing 22

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 08/19/09 granting 21 motion for an extension of time. Plaintiff is granted 45 days from the date of service of this order in which to respond to defendant Williams' first set of requests for production of documents. (Plummer, M)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
DAD:9 hand2765.36disc(2)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MARQUETTE HANDY, Plaintiff, vs. DEBRINA WILLIAMS, et al., Defendants. / Plaintiff has requested a forty-five-day extension of time to respond to defendant Williams' First Set of Requests for Production of Documents. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff's August 14, 2009 motion for an extension of time (Doc. No. 21) is granted; and 2. Plaintiff is granted forty-five days from the date of service of this order in which to respond to defendant Williams' First Set of Requests for Production of Documents. DATED: August 19, 2009. ORDER No. CIV S-08-2765 LKK DAD P