Milligan v. Ahlin

Filing 15

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 8/19/2009. The Court shall acknowledge petitioner is NOT a state prisoner, but rather a person under an Order of Civil Commitment. (Marciel, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. PAM AHLIN, Respondent. / Petitioner, who is under an order of civil commitment, proceeds without counsel in this action in which he seeks a writ of habeas corpus. See 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Currently pending is petitioner's motion to correct the court's misunderstanding of his status. In previous orders, the court has referred to the petitioner as a state prisoner. Petitioner has notified the court that he is not serving a sentence for a criminal conviction. Rather, he is under an order of civil commitment. Petitioner's notice to the court is well-taken. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that henceforth, the court shall acknowledge petitioner not as a state prisoner, but rather as a person under an order of civil commitment. Dated: August 19, 2009. ORDER IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA TIMOTHY L. MILLIGAN, Petitioner, No. CIV S-08-2766 MCE EFB P

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?