Heilman v. Vokufka et al
Filing
149
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 1/27/14 ordering the unopposed request 148 will be granted but no further extensions of time will be granted for this purpose. The parties are directed to advise the court within 30 days of the date of this order when a dismissal will be filed in keeping with the settlement agreement that was placed on the record in this action. (Plummer, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
THOMAS JOHN HEILMAN,
Plaintiff,
11
vs.
12
13
No. 2:08-cv-2788 KJM EFB P
ORDER
VOJKUFKA, et al.,
Defendants.
14
15
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding with counsel in this civil rights action pursuant to
16
17
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983. On September 5, 2013, the parties appeared before the undersigned, a
18
settlement conference was held, a settlement agreement was reached and the essential terms and
19
conditions of that settlement agreement were summarized by the parties on the record. Under the
20
terms of that agreement, a dismissal of this action was to have been filed long ago.
21
On January 24, 2014, plaintiff, through his appointed counsel, file an unopposed request
22
for a thirty day continuance to review a transcript of the settlement agreement as summarized on
23
the record on September 5, 2013, with respect to all material terms. The unopposed request will
24
be granted but no further extensions of time will be granted for this purpose. The parties are
25
/////
26
/////
27
/////
28
/////
1
1
directed to advise the court within thirty days of the date of this order when a dismissal will be
2
filed in keeping with the settlement agreement that was placed on the record in this action.
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 27, 2014
5
6
7
Ddad1\orders.prisioner-civilrights
heil2788.cont30.docx
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?