Heilman v. Vokufka et al
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 09/02/10 ordering plaintiff's 08/18/10 motion for extension of time 47 is granted and plaintiff shall have until 10/25/10 to file an opposition to defendant's 08/02/10 motion for summa ry judgment. Plaintiff's 08/10/10 and 08/11/10 motions to stay defendant's 08/02/10 motion for summary judgment 43 and 45 are denied without prejudice. Plaintiff's 08/11/10 motion to correct the spelling of defendant's name 44 is granted and the Clerk of the Court is directed to correct the spelling of defendant's name to "Vojkufka" on the docket. (Plummer, M)
(PC) Heilman v. Vojkufka et al
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 The court has been informed by the parties that the correct spelling of defendant's name is "Vojkufka." Accordingly, the court will grant plaintiff's August 11, 2010 request to correct the spelling of defendant's name on the caption. Dckt. No. 44.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA THOMAS JOHN HEILMAN, Plaintiff, vs. VOJKUFKA1, Defendant. / Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He requests a stay of defendant's August 2, 2010 motion for summary judgment or an extension of time to file and serve an opposition that motion, which was filed during the 60-day extension provided by the court for limited discovery in its order of July 26, 2010 pursuant to an earlier court order granting defendant an extension of time to file a summary judgment motion. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b); Dckt. Nos. 37 (order granting defendant 14 days from July 16, 2010 to file a motion for summary judgment), 38 (order granting plaintiff 60 days from July 26, 2010 for limited discovery). ORDER No. CIV S-08-2788 FCD EFB P
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
Due to the extended discovery deadline, which expires on September 24, 2010, the court will grant plaintiff's August 18, 2010 request for an extension of time. Plaintiff shall have 30 days from the expiration of the September 24, 2010 discovery deadline to file and serve to file an opposition to the motion for summary judgment. A stay is thus currently unnecessary, and plaintiff's request for a stay will accordingly be denied without prejudice. Plaintiff also indicates in his motion for stay that he objects to defendant's use of his medical information in the motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff has filed a motion to prohibit defendant's use of such information. Dckt. No. 46. The court defers any determination on the appropriateness of defendant's use of plaintiff's medical information until it has received defendant's opposition or statement of no opposition to plaintiff's motion in accordance with Local Rule 230(l). Accordingly, it is here by ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff's August 18, 2010 motion for extension of time (Docket No. 47) is granted, and plaintiff shall have until October 25, 2010 to file an opposition to defendant's August 2, 2010 motion for summary judgment; 2. Plaintiff's August 10, 2010 and August 11, 2010 motions to stay defendant's August 2, 2010 motion for summary judgment (Docket Nos. 43 and 45) are denied without prejudice; 3. Plaintiff's August 11, 2010 motion to correct the spelling of defendant's name (Docket No. 44) is granted, and the Clerk of the Court is directed to correct the spelling of defendant's name to "Vojkufka" on the docket. DATED: September 2, 2010.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?