Heilman v. Vokufka et al

Filing 93

ORDER ADOPTING 88 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 3/21/12 ORDERING that the 79 Motion to Strike the 77 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED; pltf's renewed 81 Request is DENIED. (Manzer, C)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 THOMAS JOHN HEILMAN, Plaintiff, 11 No. CIV S-08-2788 KJM EFB P vs. 12 13 MICHAEL VOJKUFKA, 14 Defendant. ORDER / 15 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action 16 17 seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 18 Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On September 20, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and 19 20 recommendations, which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that 21 any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. 22 Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United 23 24 States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are 25 reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 26 ///// 1 1 1983). Having carefully reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to 2 be supported by the record and by the proper analysis. 3 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 4 1. The findings and recommendations filed September 20, 2011, are adopted in 5 6 full; 2. Defendant’s March 29, 2011 motion to strike (Docket No. 79) is granted, and 7 plaintiff’s March 8, 2011 motion for summary judgment/judgment on the pleadings (Docket No. 8 77) is stricken; and 9 3. Plaintiff’s renewed request that the court determine that defendant and defense 10 counsel have acted in bad faith (Docket No. 81) is denied. 11 DATED: March 21, 2012. 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?