Heilman v. Vokufka et al
Filing
93
ORDER ADOPTING 88 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 3/21/12 ORDERING that the 79 Motion to Strike the 77 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED; pltf's renewed 81 Request is DENIED. (Manzer, C)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
THOMAS JOHN HEILMAN,
Plaintiff,
11
No. CIV S-08-2788 KJM EFB P
vs.
12
13
MICHAEL VOJKUFKA,
14
Defendant.
ORDER
/
15
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action
16
17
seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate
18
Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On September 20, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and
19
20
recommendations, which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that
21
any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days.
22
Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.
The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United
23
24
States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are
25
reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir.
26
/////
1
1
1983). Having carefully reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to
2
be supported by the record and by the proper analysis.
3
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
4
1. The findings and recommendations filed September 20, 2011, are adopted in
5
6
full;
2. Defendant’s March 29, 2011 motion to strike (Docket No. 79) is granted, and
7
plaintiff’s March 8, 2011 motion for summary judgment/judgment on the pleadings (Docket No.
8
77) is stricken; and
9
3. Plaintiff’s renewed request that the court determine that defendant and defense
10
counsel have acted in bad faith (Docket No. 81) is denied.
11
DATED: March 21, 2012.
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?