Armentero v. Sisto et al

Filing 82

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 10/22/13 ordering the court hereby vacates the scheduling order 78 . Should the parties fail to stipulate to dismissal by March 2014, following the anticipated mid-February date for defendant's issuance of settlement funds, they must inform the court forthwith. (Plummer, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10

LUIS LORENZO ARMENTERO,

11
12
13

No. 2:08-cv-2790 AC P

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER

S. WILLIS,

14

Defendants.

15
16

On September 5, 2013, attorneys for plaintiff filed notice that the parties in this action had

17

reached a settlement. ECF No. 79. The court was informed that the parties anticipate filing a

18

stipulation of dismissal once settlement funds have been deposited in plaintiff’s account.

19

On October 18, 2013, counsel for defendant requested that the scheduling order be

20

vacated in light of the settlement reached by the parties. ECF No. 80. Accordingly, the court

21

hereby VACATES the scheduling order at ECF No. 78. Should the parties fail to stipulate to

22

dismissal by March 2014, following the anticipated mid-February date for defendant’s issuance of

23

settlement funds, they must inform the court forthwith.

24
25

IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: October 22, 2013

26
27
28

AC:009/arme2790.ord

1