Passer v. Steevers et al

Filing 106

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 6/20/14 ORDERING that Plaintiffs motion for extension of time (ECF No. 105 ) is granted; The June 26, 2014 hearing before the undersigned is vacated; The non-expert discovery deadline is cont inued to August 31, 2014; The expert disclosure deadline is continued to August 31, 2014; The expert deposition deadline is continued to September 15, 2014; and all pretrial motions, except motions to compel discovery, shall be filed on or before September 25, 2014. (Dillon, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANTHONY VINCENT PASSER, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:08-cv-2792 MCE KJN P v. ORDER DR. STEEVERS, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding through counsel. On May 30, 2014, counsel for all 17 18 parties submitted a stipulation extending the nonexpert discovery deadline and the expert 19 disclosure date to June 30, 2014; the expert deposition deadline to July 30, 2014; and the deadline 20 for hearing pretrial motions to September 15, 2014. Also on May 30, 2014, counsel for plaintiff filed a motion to further extend the above 21 22 deadlines, and noticed it for hearing on June 26, 2014. Defendants have not opposed the motion. 23 “The district court is given broad discretion in supervising the pretrial phase of litigation.” 24 Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d 604, 607 (9th Cir. 1992) (citation and internal 25 quotation marks omitted). Rule 16(b) provides that “[a] schedule may be modified only for good 26 cause and with the judge's consent.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(4). “The schedule may be modified ‘if 27 it cannot reasonably be met despite the diligence of the party seeking the extension.’” Zivkovic 28 //// 1 1 v. Southern California Edison Co., 302 F.3d 1080, 1087 (9th Cir. 2002) (quoting Johnson, 975 2 F.2d at 607). 3 The court grants plaintiff’s request for additional extensions due to the complex medical 4 issues, records and treatment, as well as plaintiff’s counsel’s diligence, and the number of 5 depositions required in this matter. (ECF No. 105 at 4-5.) However, counsel for plaintiff is 6 cautioned that the court is not inclined to grant further extensions of the scheduling order. 7 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 8 1. Plaintiff’s motion for extension of time (ECF No. 105) is granted; 9 2. The June 26, 2014 hearing before the undersigned is vacated; 10 3. The non-expert discovery deadline is continued to August 31, 2014; 11 4. The expert disclosure deadline is continued to August 31, 2014; 12 5. The expert deposition deadline is continued to September 15, 2014; and 13 6. All pretrial motions, except motions to compel discovery, shall be filed on or before 14 15 September 25, 2014. Motions shall be briefed pursuant to Local Rule 230(l). Dated: June 20, 2014 16 17 /pass2792.eot 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?